Lessons learnt from the recent EURADOS intercomparisons in computational dosimetry
Hans Rabus (1,7), Maria Zankl (2,7), Jose Maria Gomez-Ros (3,7),, Carmen Villagrasa (4,7), Jonathan Eakins (5,7), Christelle Huet (4,7), Hrvoje, Brkic (6,7), Rick Tanner (5,7) ((1) Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, (PTB), Abbestrasse 2-12, 10587 Berlin

TL;DR
This paper reviews recent EURADOS intercomparison exercises in computational dosimetry, highlighting lessons learned, current state of the art, and future needs for quality assurance in the field.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of recent intercomparison exercises, offering insights into best practices and areas for development in computational dosimetry quality assurance.
Findings
Identified strengths and weaknesses in current computational dosimetry methods
Highlighted the importance of standardized procedures for quality assurance
Recommended future directions for research and validation
Abstract
Organized by Working Group 6 "Computational Dosimetry" of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), a group of intercomparison exercises was conducted in which participants were asked to solve predefined problems in computational dosimetry. The results of these comparisons were published in a series of articles in this virtual special issue of Radiation Measurements. This paper reviews the experience gained from the various exercises and highlights the resulting conclusions for future exercises, as well as regarding the state of the art and the need for development in terms of quality assurance for computational dosimetry techniques.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
