Wrist-Squeezing Force Feedback Improves Accuracy and Speed in Robotic Surgery Training

TL;DR

Providing wrist-squeezing force feedback in robotic surgery training enhances accuracy and accelerates skill acquisition without sacrificing speed, offering a promising approach for improving minimally invasive surgical training.

Contribution

This study introduces a novel wrist-squeezing haptic feedback device that improves surgical training by increasing accuracy and speed of skill acquisition.

Findings

Participants with haptic feedback applied less force (0.67 N).

Feedback group improved task completion time faster (7.68%).

Haptic feedback enhances accuracy without reducing speed.

Abstract

Current robotic minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) platforms provide surgeons with no haptic feedback of the robot's physical interactions. This limitation forces surgeons to rely heavily on visual feedback and can make it challenging for surgical trainees to manipulate tissue gently. Prior research has demonstrated that haptic feedback can increase task accuracy in RMIS training. However, it remains unclear whether these improvements represent a fundamental improvement in skill, or if they simply stem from re-prioritizing accuracy over task completion time. In this study, we provide haptic feedback of the force applied by the surgical instruments using custom wrist-squeezing devices. We hypothesize that individuals receiving haptic feedback will increase accuracy (produce less force) while increasing their task completion time, compared to a control group receiving no haptic feedback. To test this hypothesis, N=21 novice participants were asked to repeatedly complete a ring rollercoaster surgical training task as quickly as possible. Results show that participants receiving haptic feedback apply significantly less force (0.67 N) than the control group, and they complete the task no faster or slower than the control group after twelve repetitions. Furthermore, participants in the feedback group decreased their task completion times significantly faster (7.68%) than participants in the control group (5.26%). This form of haptic feedback, therefore, has the potential to help trainees improve their technical accuracy without compromising speed.