On multilevel Monte Carlo methods for deterministic and uncertain hyperbolic systems
Junpeng Hu, Shi Jin, Jinglai Li, Lei Zhang

TL;DR
This paper investigates the effectiveness of multilevel Monte Carlo methods for hyperbolic systems, revealing that MLMC may not always provide computational advantages over standard Monte Carlo due to the complex interplay of variance, bias, and cost.
Contribution
The paper characterizes conditions under which MLMC can or cannot accelerate Monte Carlo sampling for hyperbolic systems, providing analytical and numerical insights.
Findings
MLMC may not always outperform MC in hyperbolic systems.
Performance depends on variance, bias, and computational cost parameters.
Three regimes identified where MLMC is beneficial or not.
Abstract
In this paper, we evaluate the performance of the multilevel Monte Carlo method (MLMC) for deterministic and uncertain hyperbolic systems, where randomness is introduced either in the modeling parameters or in the approximation algorithms. MLMC is a well known variance reduction method widely used to accelerate Monte Carlo (MC) sampling. However, we demonstrate in this paper that for hyperbolic systems, whether MLMC can achieve a real boost turns out to be delicate. The computational costs of MLMC and MC depend on the interplay among the accuracy (bias) and the computational cost of the numerical method for a single sample, as well as the variances of the sampled MLMC corrections or MC solutions. We characterize three regimes for the MLMC and MC performances using those parameters, and show that MLMC may not accelerate MC and can even have a higher cost when the variances of MC…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
