Low-variance estimation in the Plackett-Luce model via quasi-Monte Carlo sampling
Alexander Buchholz, Jan Malte Lichtenberg, Giuseppe Di Benedetto,, Yannik Stein, Vito Bellini, Matteo Ruffini

TL;DR
This paper introduces a quasi-Monte Carlo sampling method combined with the Gumbel top-k trick to produce low-variance estimators for expectations in the Plackett-Luce model, improving efficiency in ranking tasks.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel low-variance estimation technique for the Plackett-Luce model by integrating QMC sampling with the Gumbel top-k trick, enhancing sampling efficiency.
Findings
QMC-Gumbel method reduces estimator variance.
Empirical results show improved ranking evaluation accuracy.
Method demonstrates efficiency on real-world recommendation data.
Abstract
The Plackett-Luce (PL) model is ubiquitous in learning-to-rank (LTR) because it provides a useful and intuitive probabilistic model for sampling ranked lists. Counterfactual offline evaluation and optimization of ranking metrics are pivotal for using LTR methods in production. When adopting the PL model as a ranking policy, both tasks require the computation of expectations with respect to the model. These are usually approximated via Monte-Carlo (MC) sampling, since the combinatorial scaling in the number of items to be ranked makes their analytical computation intractable. Despite recent advances in improving the computational efficiency of the sampling process via the Gumbel top-k trick, the MC estimates can suffer from high variance. We develop a novel approach to producing more sample-efficient estimators of expectations in the PL model by combining the Gumbel top-k trick with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Economic and Environmental Valuation
