On Upward-Planar L-Drawings of Graphs
Patrizio Angelini, Steven Chaplick, Sabine Cornelsen, Giordano Da, Lozzo

TL;DR
This paper explores upward-planar L-drawings of DAGs, extending previous work on st-graphs to more general DAGs, providing combinatorial characterizations and efficient algorithms for testing their existence.
Contribution
It characterizes when general DAGs admit upward-planar L-drawings and develops linear-time algorithms for specific classes of DAGs.
Findings
A plane DAG admits an upward-planar L-drawing iff it is a subgraph of a suitable plane st-graph.
Not all trees with fixed bimodal embedding admit such drawings.
Cacti with a single source or sink admit upward-planar L-drawings under certain conditions.
Abstract
In an upward-planar L-drawing of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) each edge is represented as a polyline composed of a vertical segment with its lowest endpoint at the tail of and of a horizontal segment ending at the head of . Distinct edges may overlap, but not cross. Recently, upward-planar L-drawings have been studied for -graphs, i.e., planar DAGs with a single source and a single sink containing an edge directed from to . It is known that a plane -graph, i.e., an embedded -graph in which the edge is incident to the outer face, admits an upward-planar L-drawing if and only if it admits a bitonic -ordering, which can be tested in linear time. We study upward-planar L-drawings of DAGs that are not necessarily -graphs. On the combinatorial side, we show that a plane DAG admits an upward-planar L-drawing if and only if it is a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
