Externally Valid Policy Choice
Christopher Adjaho, Timothy Christensen

TL;DR
This paper develops methods for estimating personalized treatment policies that remain effective across different populations, addressing the challenge of external validity and distributional shifts in outcomes and characteristics.
Contribution
It introduces robust policy estimation techniques that account for shifts in outcome distributions and highlights the role of treatment heterogeneity in external validity.
Findings
Welfare-maximizing policies are robust to certain outcome distribution shifts.
Methods for estimating policies resilient to joint distribution shifts.
Treatment heterogeneity influences external validity of policies.
Abstract
We consider the problem of estimating personalized treatment policies that are "externally valid" or "generalizable": they perform well in target populations that differ from the experimental (or training) population from which the data are sampled. We first show that welfare-maximizing policies for the experimental population are robust to a certain class of shifts in the distribution of potential outcomes between the experimental and target populations (holding characteristics fixed). We then develop methods for estimating policies that are robust to shifts in the joint distribution of outcomes and characteristics. In doing so, we highlight how treatment effect heterogeneity within the experimental population shapes external validity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
