
TL;DR
The paper introduces a symmetric meta-Turing test where humans and machines evaluate each other, aiming to improve robustness against deception compared to the original Turing test.
Contribution
It proposes a novel, reciprocal testing framework that enhances the robustness of evaluating machine intelligence over the traditional imitation game.
Findings
The meta-Turing test reduces susceptibility to simple deception.
Refinements improve the test's robustness and applicability.
The approach can be adapted to enhance the original Turing test.
Abstract
We propose an alternative to the Turing test that removes the inherent asymmetry between humans and machines in Turing's original imitation game. In this new test, both humans and machines judge each other. We argue that this makes the test more robust against simple deceptions. We also propose a small number of refinements to improve further the test. These refinements could be applied also to Turing's original imitation game.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Cognitive Computing and Networks
