Sensible AI: Re-imagining Interpretability and Explainability using Sensemaking Theory
Harmanpreet Kaur, Eytan Adar, Eric Gilbert, Cliff Lampe

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel interpretability framework for AI based on sensemaking theory, emphasizing understanding the human audience's needs and context to improve explanations of ML models.
Contribution
It proposes a sensemaking-based approach to AI interpretability, focusing on stakeholder-specific explanations and design guidelines for more human-centric AI explanations.
Findings
Defines properties influencing human understanding, such as identity and social context.
Provides design guidelines for Sensible AI to enhance interpretability.
Connects organizational sensemaking principles to AI explanation design.
Abstract
Understanding how ML models work is a prerequisite for responsibly designing, deploying, and using ML-based systems. With interpretability approaches, ML can now offer explanations for its outputs to aid human understanding. Though these approaches rely on guidelines for how humans explain things to each other, they ultimately solve for improving the artifact -- an explanation. In this paper, we propose an alternate framework for interpretability grounded in Weick's sensemaking theory, which focuses on who the explanation is intended for. Recent work has advocated for the importance of understanding stakeholders' needs -- we build on this by providing concrete properties (e.g., identity, social context, environmental cues, etc.) that shape human understanding. We use an application of sensemaking in organizations as a template for discussing design guidelines for Sensible AI, AI that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
