Chemical potential, derivative discontinuity, fractional electrons, jump of the Kohn-Sham potential, atoms as thermodynamic open systems, and other (mis)conceptions of the density functional theory of electrons in molecules
Evert Jan Baerends

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the concept of chemical potential in density functional theory, arguing that it is not a physical property for atoms and molecules and challenging common interpretations of derivative discontinuities and related concepts.
Contribution
The paper clarifies that the chemical potential and derivative discontinuities in DFT are nonphysical artifacts and discusses their implications for understanding electronic structure in molecules.
Findings
Chemical potential in atoms and molecules is not a well-defined physical quantity.
Derivative discontinuity is a nonphysical artifact arising from specific energy choices.
Thermodynamic concepts like open systems do not apply to small electron systems.
Abstract
Many references exist in the density functional theory (DFT) literature to the chemical potential of the electrons in an atom or a molecule. The origin of this notion has been the identification of the Lagrange multiplier in the Euler-Lagrange variational equation for the ground state density as the chemical potential of the electrons. We first discuss why the Lagrange multiplier in this case is an arbitrary constant and therefore cannot be a physical characteristic of an atom or molecule. The switching of the energy derivative ("chemical potential") from to when the electron number crosses the integer, called integer discontinuity or derivative discontinuity, is not physical but only occurs when the nonphysical noninteger electron systems and the corresponding energy and derivative are chosen in a specific discontinuous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
