Point-splitting regularization of the stress tensor of a coupling scalar field in de Sitter space
Xuan Ye, Yang Zhang, Bo Wang

TL;DR
This paper applies point-splitting regularization to the vacuum stress tensor of a scalar field in de Sitter space, revealing conditions under which the regularized tensor is finite and consistent with inflation, and comparing it to adiabatic regularization.
Contribution
It demonstrates the effectiveness of second-order point-splitting regularization for certain couplings and clarifies issues with divergences and path dependence, aligning results with adiabatic regularization.
Findings
For minimal coupling, the stress tensor is finite and positive, acting as a cosmological constant.
For non-zero coupling, additional treatments are needed to remove divergences and path dependencies.
Regularized stress tensor matches that from adiabatic regularization across cases.
Abstract
We perform the point-splitting regularization on the vacuum stress tensor of a coupling scalar field in de Sitter space under the guidance from the adiabatically regularized Green's function. For the massive scalar field with the minimal coupling , the 2nd order point-splitting regularization yields a finite vacuum stress tensor with a positive, constant energy density, which can be identified as the cosmological constant that drives de Sitter inflation. For the coupling , we find that, even if the regularized Green's function is continuous, UV and IR convergent, the point-splitting regularization does not automatically lead to an appropriate stress tensor. The coupling causes log divergent terms, as well as higher-order finite terms which depend upon the path of the coincidence limit. After removing these unwanted terms by extra treatments, the 2nd-order…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
