Redshifts of radio sources in the Million Quasars Catalogue from machine learning
S. J. Curran, J. P. Moss, Y. C. Perrott

TL;DR
This study explores machine learning methods to estimate redshifts of radio sources using optical and near-infrared data, achieving reliable predictions for a subset of sources and expanding redshift estimates for a larger sample, with implications for future surveys.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of machine learning in predicting radio source redshifts using optical and infrared data, and highlights the potential for future surveys like SkyMapper and SKA.
Findings
Reliable redshift predictions for 12,503 sources using optical/infrared data.
Expanded redshift estimates to 32,698 sources by imputing missing magnitudes.
Model performance improves with larger training samples, but radio spectra alone are insufficient.
Abstract
With the aim of using machine learning techniques to obtain photometric redshifts based upon a source's radio spectrum alone, we have extracted the radio sources from the Million Quasars Catalogue. Of these, 44,119 have a spectroscopic redshift, required for model validation, and for which photometry could be obtained. Using the radio spectral properties as features, we fail to find a model which can reliably predict the redshifts, although there is the suggestion that the models improve with the size of the training sample. Using the near-infrared--optical--ultraviolet bands magnitudes, we obtain reliable predictions based on the 12,503 radio sources which have all of the required photometry. From the 80:20 training--validation split, this gives only 2501 validation sources, although training the sample upon our previous SDSS model gives comparable results for all 12,503 sources. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
