An Energy-dependent Electro-thermal Response Model of CUORE Cryogenic Calorimeter
CUORE Collaboration: D. Q. Adams, C. Alduino, K. Alfonso, F. T., Avignone III, O. Azzolini, G. Bari, F. Bellini, G. Benato, M. Beretta, M., Biassoni, A. Branca, C. Brofferio, C. Bucci, J. Camilleri, A. Caminata, A., Campani, L. Canonica, X. G. Cao, S. Capelli, C. Capelli

TL;DR
This paper develops a detailed non-linear electro-thermal model for CUORE cryogenic calorimeters, improving understanding of detector response and pulse shape behavior to enhance sensitivity in neutrinoless double-beta decay searches.
Contribution
It introduces an empirical correction to the thermistor model and demonstrates improved agreement with detector data, advancing thermal modeling of cryogenic calorimeters.
Findings
The empirical correction improves pulse shape modeling up to 6 MeV.
Intrinsic thermal noise is negligible compared to observed noise.
The model captures energy-dependent pulse shapes more accurately.
Abstract
The Cryogenic Underground Observatory for Rare Events (CUORE) is the most sensitive experiment searching for neutrinoless double-beta decay () in . CUORE uses a cryogenic array of 988 TeO calorimeters operated at 10 mK with a total mass of 741 kg. To further increase the sensitivity, the detector response must be well understood. Here, we present a non-linear thermal model for the CUORE experiment on a detector-by-detector basis. We have examined both equilibrium and dynamic electro-thermal models of detectors by numerically fitting non-linear differential equations to the detector data of a subset of CUORE channels which are well characterized and representative of all channels. We demonstrate that the hot-electron effect and electric-field dependence of resistance in NTD-Ge thermistors alone are inadequate to describe our detectors' energy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
