Performance of the polarization leakage correction in the PILOT data
J-Ph. Bernard, A. Bernard, H. Roussel, I. Choubani, D. Alina, J., Aumont, A. Hughes, I. Ristorcelli, S. Stever, T. Matsumura S. Sugiyama, K., Komatsu, G. de Gasperis, K. Ferriere, V. Guillet, N. Ysard, P. Ade, P. de, Bernardis, N. Bray, B. Crane, J.P. Dubois, M. Griffin

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of polarization leakage correction methods in PILOT data, demonstrating improvements in data accuracy for polarization measurements of interstellar dust emission.
Contribution
It introduces new data processing corrections for instrumental effects, especially intensity to polarization leakage, enhancing the accuracy of PILOT's polarization data.
Findings
Leakage correction accuracy better than 0.4% on Jupiter
Effective correction of detector cross-talk and readout effects
Improved polarization measurement precision
Abstract
The Polarized Instrument for Long-wavelength Observation of the Tenuous interstellar medium (PILOT) is a balloon-borne experiment that aims to measure the polarized emission of thermal dust at a wavelength of 240 um (1.2 THz). The PILOT experiment flew from Timmins, Ontario, Canada in 2015 and 2019 and from Alice Springs, Australia in April 2017. The in-flight performance of the instrument during the second flight was described in Mangilli et al. 2019. In this paper, we present data processing steps that were not presented in Mangilli et al. 2019 and that we have recently implemented to correct for several remaining instrumental effects. The additional data processing concerns corrections related to detector cross-talk and readout circuit memory effects, and leakage from total intensity to polarization. We illustrate the above effects and the performance of our corrections using data…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
