Post Approvals in Online Communities
Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Justin Cheng, Robert West

TL;DR
This study analyzes how implementing post approval in Facebook Groups affects user activity, moderation, and content quality, revealing nuanced impacts based on group size and usage patterns.
Contribution
It provides the first longitudinal analysis of post approval adoption, detailing its effects on community behavior and moderation dynamics in online groups.
Findings
Post approvals lead to fewer but higher-quality posts.
Members engage more through comments and reactions after adoption.
Impact varies with group size and moderation practices.
Abstract
In many online communities, community leaders (i.e., moderators and administrators) can proactively filter undesired content by requiring posts to be approved before publication. But although many communities adopt post approvals, there has been little research on its impact on community behavior. Through a longitudinal analysis of 233,402 Facebook Groups, we examined 1) the factors that led to a community adopting post approvals and 2) how the setting shaped subsequent user activity and moderation in the group. We find that communities that adopted post approvals tended to do so following sudden increases in user activity (e.g., comments) and moderation (e.g., reported posts). This adoption of post approvals led to fewer but higher-quality posts. Though fewer posts were shared after adoption, not only did community members write more comments, use more reactions, and spend more time on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSocial Media and Politics · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
