TL;DR
This paper emphasizes that practical ontology reuse is essential for verifying and enhancing ontology quality, especially in complex biomedical and computer science domains, despite advances in automated quality assurance tools.
Contribution
It introduces diverse methods for detecting issues in ontology reuse and advocates for reuse as the key to ongoing quality improvement and development.
Findings
Analysis of 30 biomedical ontologies and the Computer Science Ontology.
Identification of issues through natural language processing and network analysis.
Reusing ontologies helps find and fix problems, guiding future development.
Abstract
Reusing ontologies in practice is still very challenging, especially when multiple ontologies are (jointly) involved. Moreover, despite recent advances, the realization of systematic ontology quality assurance remains a difficult problem. In this work, the quality of thirty biomedical ontologies, and the Computer Science Ontology are investigated, from the perspective of a practical use case. Special scrutiny is given to cross-ontology references, which are vital for combining ontologies. Diverse methods to detect potential issues are proposed, including natural language processing and network analysis. Moreover, several suggestions for improving ontologies and their quality assurance processes are presented. It is argued that while the advancing automatic tools for ontology quality assurance are crucial for ontology improvement, they will not solve the problem entirely. It is ontology…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsOntology
