Theories of "Gender" in NLP Bias Research
Hannah Devinney, Jenny Bj\"orklund, Henrik Bj\"orklund

TL;DR
This paper surveys nearly 200 NLP articles on gender bias, revealing a lack of explicit gender theory, limited inclusivity, and the need for interdisciplinary approaches to improve research practices.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of how gender is conceptualized in NLP bias research and offers recommendations for more inclusive and theoretically grounded future work.
Findings
Most articles do not explicitly theorize gender.
Very few consider nonbinary or intersectional gender models.
An increase in acknowledgment of gender's complexity over time.
Abstract
The rise of concern around Natural Language Processing (NLP) technologies containing and perpetuating social biases has led to a rich and rapidly growing area of research. Gender bias is one of the central biases being analyzed, but to date there is no comprehensive analysis of how "gender" is theorized in the field. We survey nearly 200 articles concerning gender bias in NLP to discover how the field conceptualizes gender both explicitly (e.g. through definitions of terms) and implicitly (e.g. through how gender is operationalized in practice). In order to get a better idea of emerging trajectories of thought, we split these articles into two sections by time. We find that the majority of the articles do not make their theorization of gender explicit, even if they clearly define "bias." Almost none use a model of gender that is intersectional or inclusive of nonbinary genders; and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
