The Discovery of a Planetary Companion Interior to Hot Jupiter WASP-132 b
Benjamin J. Hord, Knicole D. Col\'on, Travis A. Berger, Veselin, Kostov, Michele L. Silverstein, Keivan G. Stassun, Jack J. Lissauer, Karen A., Collins, Richard P. Schwarz, Ramotholo Sefako, Carl Ziegler, C\'esar, Brice\~no, Nicholas Law, Andrew W. Mann, George R. Ricker

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery and validation of a close-in small planet orbiting near the hot Jupiter WASP-132 b, challenging the typical absence of companions in such systems and providing insights into planetary formation.
Contribution
It presents the first validated detection of a planetary companion interior to a hot Jupiter, using combined TESS, ground-based, and radial velocity data, with implications for migration theories.
Findings
Validated a 1.85 R⊕ planet interior to WASP-132 b.
Ruled out common false positives with low probabilities.
System remains dynamically stable over 100 million years.
Abstract
Hot Jupiters are generally observed to lack close planetary companions, a trend that has been interpreted as evidence for high-eccentricity migration. We present the discovery and validation of WASP-132 c (TOI-822.02), a 1.85 0.10 planet on a 1.01 day orbit interior to the hot Jupiter WASP-132 b. Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) and ground-based follow-up observations, in conjunction with vetting and validation analysis, enable us to rule out common astrophysical false positives and validate the observed transit signal produced by WASP-132 c as a planet. Running the validation tools \texttt{vespa} and \texttt{triceratops} on this signal yield false positive probabilities of and 0.0107, respectively. Analysis of archival CORALIE radial velocity data leads to a 3 upper limit of 28.23 ms on the amplitude of any 1.01-day…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
