
TL;DR
This paper provides a detailed exposition of the historical proofs of the law of Quadratic Reciprocity, including Legendre's initial attempt, Teege's rigorous proof, and Rogers' implicit proof, which were previously not thoroughly documented.
Contribution
It offers the first comprehensive and detailed exposition of the proofs by Legendre, Teege, and Rogers, clarifying their contributions to quadratic reciprocity.
Findings
Clarifies the historical development of quadratic reciprocity proofs
Provides detailed explanations of Teege's and Rogers' proofs
Fills a gap in mathematical literature on quadratic reciprocity proofs
Abstract
Legendre published the first attempted proof of the law of Quadratic Reciprocity. But, in its final form (1797), it had a gap. Some 125 years later Herman Teege published the first rigorous proof of the unproven hypothesis which formed that gap. Then, 48 years later Kenneth Rogers published a second (but implicit) proof. These proofs lifted Legendre's attempt to the list of complete proofs. No detailed exposition of these proofs appears in the literature. Our paper fills that gap.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and History of Science · History and Theory of Mathematics · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
