TL;DR
This paper enhances the E theorem prover's performance on Isabelle Sledgehammer problems by integrating learning-based guidance, premise selection, and strategies, achieving a 25.3% improvement over previous methods.
Contribution
It introduces targeted ENIGMA guidance, neural premise selection, and strategies specifically optimized for Isabelle problems, advancing automated theorem proving techniques.
Findings
25.3% performance improvement over previous E system
Outperforms all previous ATP and SMT systems on Isabelle problems
Effective integration of learning and theorem proving methods
Abstract
We significantly improve the performance of the E automated theorem prover on the Isabelle Sledgehammer problems by combining learning and theorem proving in several ways. In particular, we develop targeted versions of the ENIGMA guidance for the Isabelle problems, targeted versions of neural premise selection, and targeted strategies for E. The methods are trained in several iterations over hundreds of thousands untyped and typed first-order problems extracted from Isabelle. Our final best single-strategy ENIGMA and premise selection system improves the best previous version of E by 25.3% in 15 seconds, outperforming also all other previous ATP and SMT systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsENIGMA
