The Effect of Multiple Imputation of Routine Pathology Variables on Laboratory Diagnosis of Hepatitis C Infection
N. Menon, B.A. Lidbury, A.M. Richardson

TL;DR
This study evaluates how multiple imputation of missing pathology data, combined with Influx-Outflux measures, improves the prediction of Hepatitis C infection using routine laboratory tests.
Contribution
It introduces the use of Influx and Outflux measures to enhance imputation models for better HCV diagnosis prediction from incomplete data.
Findings
Multiple imputation maintains predictive power comparable to complete data.
Influx and Outflux effectively identify strong predictors of HCV.
Age, gender, and alanine aminotransferase are key predictors.
Abstract
Pathology tests are central to modern healthcare in terms of diagnosis and patient management. Aggregated pathology results provide opportunities for research into fundamental and applied questions in health and medicine, but data analytic challenges appear since test profiles vary between medical practitioners, resulting in missing data. In this study we provide an analytical investigation of the laboratory diagnosis of Hepatitis C (HCV) infection and focus on how to maximize the predictive value of routine pathology data. We recommend using the Influx - Outflux measures to help construct the imputation model when using multiple imputation. Data from 14,320 community-patients aged 15 - 100 years were accessed via ACT Pathology (The Canberra Hospital, Australia). Influx and Outflux were calculated to identify which variables were potentially powerful predictors of missing values.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHepatitis C virus research · Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment · Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
