Error Metrics for Partially Coherent Wavefields
Abraham Levitan, Riccardo Comin

TL;DR
This paper introduces new error metrics based on quantum state fidelity to quantitatively compare partially coherent wavefields, filling a critical gap in lensless imaging analysis.
Contribution
It reformulates existing metrics like mean squared error and Fourier ring correlation for partially coherent fields using quantum fidelity, enabling better assessment.
Findings
Metrics effectively compare partially coherent wavefields.
Reformulation bridges a gap in lensless imaging literature.
Enables quantitative reliability and resolution assessments.
Abstract
Lensless imaging methods that account for partial coherence have become very common in the past decade. However, there are no metrics in use for comparing partially coherent light fields, despite the widespread use of such metrics to compare fully coherent objects and wavefields. Here, we show how reformulating the mean squared error and Fourier ring correlation in terms of quantum state fidelity naturally generalizes them to partially coherent wavefields. These results fill an important gap in the lensless imaging literature and will enable quantitative assessments of the reliability and resolution of reconstructed partially coherent wavefields.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
