Threshold Rates of Codes Ensembles: Linear is Best
Nicolas Resch, and Chen Yuan

TL;DR
This paper establishes new bounds on the list-recoverability and list-decoding rates of random linear codes, showing they may outperform random codes and highlighting linear codes' optimality.
Contribution
It provides the first lower bounds on list-recoverability for random linear codes and extends list-decoding bounds, demonstrating linear codes' superior performance in certain regimes.
Findings
Lower bounds on list-size for list-recovery close to capacity
New rate bounds for list-of-3 decoding over f2
Linear codes outperform random codes in list-decoding rates
Abstract
In this work, we prove new results concerning the combinatorial properties of random linear codes. Firstly, we prove a lower bound on the list-size required for random linear codes over -close to capacity to list-recover with error radius and input lists of size . We show that the list-size must be at least , where is the rate of the random linear code. As a comparison, we also pin down the list size of random codes which is . This leaves open the possibility (that we consider likely) that random linear codes perform better than random codes for list-recoverability, which is in contrast to a recent gap shown for the case of list-recovery from erasures (Guruswami et al., IEEE TIT 2021B). Next, we consider list-decoding with constant list-sizes.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
