Spinning nano-carbon grains: Viable origin for anomalous microwave emission

TL;DR

This study investigates the origins of anomalous microwave emission (AME) in the Milky Way, finding that spinning nano-carbon grains are the most plausible source, while nano-silicates are unlikely to be the sole contributor.

Contribution

It introduces a novel comparison method between model predictions and observed correlations, supporting nano-carbon grains as the primary AME source and constraining nano-silicate contributions.

Findings

Nano-carbon dust explains observed AME properties.

Nano-silicates are unlikely the sole source of AME.

Nano-silicates could contribute marginally if their abundance is below 1%.

Abstract

Context. Excess microwave emission, commonly known as anomalous microwave emission (AME), is now routinely detected in the Milky Way. Although its link with the rotation of interstellar (carbonaceous) nano-grains seems to be relatively well established at cloud scales, large-scale observations show a lack of correlation between the different tracers of nano-carbons and AME, which has led the community to question the viability of this link. Aims. Using ancillary data and spinning dust models for nano-carbons and nano-silicates, we explore the extent to which the AME that come out of the Galactic Plane might originate with one or another carrier. Methods. In contrast to previous large-scale studies, our method is not built on comparing the correlations of the different dust tracers with each other, but rather on comparing the poor correlations predicted by the models with observed correlations. This is based on estimates that are as realistic as possible of the gas ionisation state and grain charge as a function of the local radiation field and gas density. Results. First, nano-carbon dust can explain all the observations for medium properties, in agreement with the latest findings about the separation of cold and warm neutral medium in the diffuse interstellar medium. The dispersion in the observations can be accounted for with little variations in the dust size distribution, abundance, or electric dipole moment. Second, regardless of the properties and abundance of the nano-silicate dust we considered, spinning nano-silicates are excluded as the sole source of the AME. Third, the best agreement with the observations is obtained when the emission of spinning nano-carbons alone is taken into account. However, a marginal participation of nano-silicates in AME production cannot be excluded as long as their abundance does not exceed $Y_{\rm Si} \sim 1\%$.