Paving the Way for Mature Secondary Research: The Seven Types of Literature Review
Paul Ralph, Sebastian Baltes

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the seven main types of secondary research in software engineering, providing definitions and guidelines to improve their selection, description, and evaluation.
Contribution
It offers a clear taxonomy of literature review types with guidelines, addressing confusion and enhancing the quality of secondary research in software engineering.
Findings
Defines seven types of secondary research
Provides guidelines for selecting and describing review types
Aims to improve review quality and evaluation
Abstract
Confusion over different kinds of secondary research, and their divergent purposes, is undermining the effectiveness and usefulness of secondary studies in software engineering. This short paper therefore explains the differences between ad hoc review, case survey, critical review, meta-analysis (aka systematic literature review), meta-synthesis (aka thematic analysis), rapid review and scoping review (aka systematic mapping study). These definitions and associated guidelines help researchers better select and describe their literature reviews, while helping reviewers select more appropriate evaluation criteria.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
