Catalysis for e-Chemistry: Need and Gaps for a Future De-Fossilized Chemical Production, with Focus on the Role of Complex (Direct) Syntheses by Electrocatalysis
Georgia Papanikolaou, Gabriele Centi, Siglinda Perathoner, Paola, Lanzafame

TL;DR
This paper discusses the importance of catalysis in transitioning to fossil fuel-free chemical production, highlighting current gaps and the need for accelerated development of renewable energy-based catalytic technologies for e-chemistry.
Contribution
It identifies key gaps in current catalysis research and proposes research directions to enable a system transformation towards sustainable e-chemistry.
Findings
Current studies do not fully address catalytic needs for e-chemistry
Accelerating renewable energy-based catalysis is crucial for net zero targets
Research should focus on complex syntheses by electrocatalysis
Abstract
The prospects, needs and limits in current approaches in catalysis to accelerate the transition to e-chemistry, where this term indicates a fossil fuel-free chemical production, are discussed. It is suggested that e-chemistry is a necessary element of the transformation to meet the targets of net zero emissions by year 2050 and that this conversion from the current petrochemistry is feasible. However, the acceleration of the development of catalytic technologies based on the use of renewable energy sources (indicated as reactive catalysis) is necessary, evidencing that these are part of a system of changes and thus should be assessed from this perspective. However, it is perceived that the current studies in the area are not properly addressing the needs to develop the catalytic technologies required for e-chemistry, presenting a series of relevant aspects and directions in which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
