TL;DR
This paper refutes a previous claim about a photon position operator, defending its properties and validity in quantum physics.
Contribution
It provides a counter-argument to the claim that the 1999 photon position operator lacks necessary properties.
Findings
The photon position operator in question has the properties required for a valid position operator.
The paper clarifies misconceptions about the operator's properties.
It reaffirms the operator's validity in quantum theory.
Abstract
This comment refutes the claim made by A. Jadczyk and A.M. Schlichtinger in arXiv:2203.14555 that the photon position operator with commuting components proposed in 1999 does not have the properties required for a photon position operator.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation · Geophysics and Sensor Technology · Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques