A Survey of Machine Narrative Reading Comprehension Assessments
Yisi Sang, Xiangyang Mou, Jing Li, Jeffrey Stanton, Mo Yu

TL;DR
This paper reviews existing machine narrative reading comprehension assessments, proposing a typology based on narrative and comprehension theories to guide future task design and address current challenges.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive typology of assessment tasks grounded in narrative and comprehension theories, aiding the development of better benchmarks.
Findings
Proposes a typology capturing key differences among assessment tasks.
Highlights implications for designing new narrative comprehension tasks.
Discusses challenges in evaluating machine narrative understanding.
Abstract
As the body of research on machine narrative comprehension grows, there is a critical need for consideration of performance assessment strategies as well as the depth and scope of different benchmark tasks. Based on narrative theories, reading comprehension theories, as well as existing machine narrative reading comprehension tasks and datasets, we propose a typology that captures the main similarities and differences among assessment tasks; and discuss the implications of our typology for new task design and the challenges of narrative reading comprehension.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
