Time- and angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy of strong-field light-dressed solids: prevalence of the adiabatic band picture
Ofer Neufeld, Wenwen Mao, Hannes H\"ubener, Nicolas Tancogne-Dejean,, Shunsuke A. Sato, Umberto De Giovannini, Angel Rubio

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that the adiabatic band picture remains valid for interpreting strong-field light-matter interactions in solids across a wide range of intensities and frequencies, providing a clearer framework for ultrafast spectroscopy.
Contribution
It shows that the adiabatic instantaneous band picture is the dominant interpretation for strong-field experiments in solids, even at high intensities and off-resonant conditions.
Findings
Adiabatic band picture survives up to high field intensities (~10^12 W/cm^2).
The adiabatic picture is valid across a wide frequency range (4000-800 nm).
Deviations from the adiabatic picture can be probed with bi-chromatic fields.
Abstract
In recent years, strong-field physics in condensed-matter was pioneered as a novel approach for controlling material properties through laser-dressing, as well as for ultrafast spectroscopy via nonlinear light-matter interactions (e.g. harmonic generation). A potential controversy arising from these advancements is that it is sometimes vague which band-picture should be used to interpret strong-field experiments: the field-free bands, the adiabatic (instantaneous) field-dressed bands, Floquet bands, or some other intermediate picture. We here try to resolve this issue by performing 'theoretical experiments' of time- and angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (Tr-ARPES) for a strong-field laser-pumped solid, which should give access to the actual observable bands of the irradiated material. To our surprise, we find that the adiabatic band-picture survives quite well, up to high field…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
