Close detached white dwarf + brown dwarf binaries: further evidence for low values of the common envelope efficiency
Monica Zorotovic, Matthias R. Schreiber

TL;DR
This study investigates the evolution of white dwarf + brown dwarf binary systems, providing evidence that a low common envelope efficiency parameter explains their formation without needing extra energy sources, aligning with previous findings for systems with main sequence companions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that observed white dwarf + brown dwarf binaries can be explained with a low common envelope efficiency, challenging the necessity of additional energy sources in their formation.
Findings
Low common envelope efficiency ($_{ m CE}$) explains the evolution of these binaries.
Recombination energy is not required to account for envelope ejection.
Results are consistent with previous studies on systems with main sequence companions.
Abstract
Common envelope evolution is a fundamental ingredient in our understanding of the formation of close binary stars containing compact objects which includes the progenitors of type Ia supernovae, short gamma ray bursts and most stellar gravitational wave sources. To predict the outcome of common envelope evolution we still rely to a large degree on a simplified energy conservation equation. Unfortunately, this equation contains a theoretically rather poorly constrained efficiency parameter () and, even worse, it is unclear if energy sources in addition to orbital energy (such as recombination energy) contribute to the envelope ejection process. In previous works we reconstructed the evolution of observed populations of post common envelope binaries (PCEBs) consisting of white dwarfs with main sequence star companions and found indications that the efficiency is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
