Interpreting the atmospheric composition of exoplanets: sensitivity to planet formation assumptions
Paul Molli\`ere, Tamara Molyarova, Bertram Bitsch, Thomas Henning,, Aaron Schneider, Laura Kreidberg, Christian Eistrup, Remo Burn, Evert, Nasedkin, Dmitry Semenov, Christoph Mordasini, Martin Schlecker, Kamber R., Schwarz, Sylvestre Lacour, Mathias Nowak, Matth\"aus Schulik

TL;DR
This paper develops a methodology to interpret exoplanet atmospheric compositions in terms of planet formation processes, highlighting how different formation assumptions influence atmospheric signatures and the challenges in uniquely constraining formation history.
Contribution
It introduces a framework to assess how various planet formation models affect atmospheric compositions, applied to the HR 8799e exoplanet, revealing the impact of migration and disk chemistry assumptions.
Findings
Including disk chemical evolution reduces the need for planetary migration.
Pebble accretion models can reproduce observed atmospheric compositions.
Some formation scenarios predict atmospheric metallicities lower than observed.
Abstract
Constraining planet formation based on the atmospheric composition of exoplanets is a fundamental goal of the exoplanet community. Existing studies commonly try to constrain atmospheric abundances, or to analyze what abundance patterns a given description of planet formation predicts. However, there is also a pressing need to develop methodologies that investigate how to transform atmospheric compositions into planetary formation inferences. In this study we summarize the complexities and uncertainties of state-of-the-art planet formation models and how they influence planetary atmospheric compositions. We introduce a methodology that explores the effect of different formation model assumptions when interpreting atmospheric compositions. We apply this framework to the directly imaged planet HR 8799e. Based on its atmospheric composition, this planet may have migrated significantly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
