One-loop central-emission vertex for two gluons in $\mathcal{N}=4$ super Yang-Mills theory
Emmet P. Byrne, Vittorio Del Duca, Lance J. Dixon, Einan Gardi and, Jennifer M. Smillie

TL;DR
This paper computes the one-loop two-gluon central emission vertex in $ ext{N}=4$ super Yang-Mills theory, a key component for advancing high-energy QCD calculations to higher precision, by analyzing six-gluon amplitudes in a specific kinematic limit.
Contribution
It provides the first explicit calculation of the one-loop two-gluon CEV in $ ext{N}=4$ SYM, capturing complex amplitude structures and facilitating future QCD and BFKL equation developments.
Findings
Factorization of the dispersive part of six-gluon amplitude in terms of the two-gluon CEV.
Explicit expression for the one-loop two-gluon CEV for any helicity configuration.
The CEV's structure reflects the complexity of six-gluon amplitudes and simplifies in the MRK limit.
Abstract
A necessary ingredient for extending the BFKL equation to next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic (NNLL) accuracy is the one-loop central emission vertex (CEV) for two gluons which are not strongly ordered in rapidity. Here we consider the one-loop six-gluon amplitude in super Yang-Mills (SYM) theory in a central next-to-multi-Regge kinematic (NMRK) limit, we show that its dispersive part factorises in terms of the two-gluon CEV, and we use it to extract the one-loop two-gluon CEV for any helicity configuration within this theory. This is a component of the two-gluon CEV in QCD. Although computed in the NMRK limit, both the colour structure and the kinematic dependence of the two-gluon CEV capture much of the complexity of the six-gluon amplitudes in general kinematics. In fact, the transcendental functions of the latter can be conveniently written in terms of impact…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
