TL;DR
This paper analyzes the limitations of current topology-driven biological network alignment methods, identifies key factors affecting their success, and demonstrates that improved algorithms and higher edge densities can enable accurate functional protein predictions.
Contribution
It reveals why existing methods fail and introduces SANA, a superior algorithm that effectively optimizes topological objectives, enabling successful alignment based solely on network topology.
Findings
SANA outperforms existing aligners in optimizing topological objectives.
High edge densities in PPI networks enable successful topology-based functional predictions.
Topological network alignment can recover orthologs with extremely low p-values.
Abstract
The function of a protein is defined by its interaction partners. Thus, topology-driven network alignment of the protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks of two species should uncover similar interaction patterns and allow identification of functionally similar proteins. Howver, few of the fifty or more algorithms for PPI network alignment have demonstrated a significant link between network topology and functional similarity, and none have recovered orthologs using network topology alone. We find that the major contributing factors to this failure are: (i) edge densities in current PPI networks are too low to expect topological network alignment to succeed; (ii) when edge densities are high enough, some measures of topological similarity easily uncover functionally similar proteins while others do not; and (iii) most network alignment algorithms fail to optimize their own topological…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsALIGN
