The Upper Edge of the Neptune Desert Is Stable Against Photoevaporation
Shreyas Vissapragada, Heather A. Knutson, Michael Greklek-McKeon,, Antonija Oklopcic, Fei Dai, Leonardo A. dos Santos, Nemanja Jovanovic,, Dimitri Mawet, Maxwell A. Millar-Blanchaer, Kimberly Paragas, Jessica J., Spake, Gautam Vasisht

TL;DR
This study investigates the stability of the upper edge of the Neptune desert against photoevaporative mass loss by observing helium absorption in several exoplanets and comparing the results with wind models, concluding photoevaporation is insufficient to explain the desert boundary.
Contribution
The paper provides new observational evidence and modeling analysis showing that photoevaporation alone cannot account for the upper edge of the Neptune desert, highlighting its role as a marker of planet formation and migration.
Findings
Helium absorption detected in three planets, tentatively in two.
Mass-loss rates align with energy-limited models for most planets.
Photoevaporation is too inefficient to shape the Neptune desert boundary.
Abstract
Transit surveys indicate that there is a deficit of Neptune-sized planets on close-in orbits. If this ``Neptune desert' is entirely cleared out by atmospheric mass loss, then planets at its upper edge should only be marginally stable against photoevaporation, exhibiting strong outflow signatures in tracers like the metastable helium triplet. We test this hypothesis by carrying out a 12-night photometric survey of the metastable helium feature with Palomar/WIRC, targeting seven gas-giant planets orbiting K-type host stars. Eight nights of data are analyzed here for the first time along with reanalyses of four previously-published datasets. We strongly detect helium absorption signals for WASP-69b, HAT-P-18b, and HAT-P-26b; tentatively detect signals for WASP-52b and NGTS-5b; and do not detect signals for WASP-177b and WASP-80b. We interpret these measured excess absorption signals using…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstro and Planetary Science · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
