Multi-wavelength properties of 850-$\mu$m selected sources from the North Ecliptic Pole SCUBA-2 survey
H. Shim, D. Lee, Y. Kim, D. Scott, S. Serjeant, Y. Ao, L. Barrufet, S., C. Chapman, D. Clements, C. J. Conselice, T. Goto, T. R. Greve, H. S. Hwang,, M. Im, W.-S. Jeong, H. K. Kim, M. Kim, S. J. Kim, A. K. H. Kong, M. P., Koprowski, M. A. Malkan, M. Michalowski, C. Pearson

TL;DR
This study identifies and characterizes 850-$$m selected submillimetre galaxies in the North Ecliptic Pole, revealing their redshift distribution, luminosities, star formation rates, and AGN contributions through multi-wavelength data analysis.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive multi-wavelength counterpart identification and detailed physical properties of a large sample of 850-$$m selected SMGs in a 2-deg$^2$ field, including their redshift, luminosity, and star formation characteristics.
Findings
69% of sources have reliable counterparts.
SMGs are at average redshift 2.5 with high infrared luminosity.
Approximately 40% of SMGs exhibit bursty star formation.
Abstract
We present the multi-wavelength counterparts of 850-m selected submillimetre sources over a 2-deg field centred on the North Ecliptic Pole. In order to overcome the large beam size (15 arcsec) of the 850-m images, deep optical to near-infrared (NIR) photometric data and arcsecond-resolution 20-cm images are used to identify counterparts of submillimetre sources. Among 647 sources, we identify 514 reliable counterparts for 449 sources (69 per cent in number), based either on probabilities of chance associations calculated from positional offsets or offsets combined with the optical-to-NIR colours. In the radio imaging, the fraction of 850-m sources having multiple counterparts is 7 per cent. The photometric redshift, infrared luminosity, stellar mass, star-formation rate (SFR), and the AGN contribution to the total infrared luminosity of the identified counterparts are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
