TL;DR
This paper introduces novel properties for evaluating explanation quality in recommender systems, focusing on recency, popularity, and diversity, and proposes re-ranking methods to optimize these properties while maintaining recommendation effectiveness.
Contribution
It conceptualizes three new properties for explanation quality and develops re-ranking approaches to optimize them in explainable recommender systems.
Findings
Improved explanation quality based on recency, popularity, and diversity.
Approaches fairly enhance explanation quality across demographic groups.
Maintains recommendation utility while optimizing explanation properties.
Abstract
Existing explainable recommender systems have mainly modeled relationships between recommended and already experienced products, and shaped explanation types accordingly (e.g., movie "x" starred by actress "y" recommended to a user because that user watched other movies with "y" as an actress). However, none of these systems has investigated the extent to which properties of a single explanation (e.g., the recency of interaction with that actress) and of a group of explanations for a recommended list (e.g., the diversity of the explanation types) can influence the perceived explaination quality. In this paper, we conceptualized three novel properties that model the quality of the explanations (linking interaction recency, shared entity popularity, and explanation type diversity) and proposed re-ranking approaches able to optimize for these properties. Experiments on two public data sets…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsREINFORCE
