A Note on the Gibbsian Representation of the Gradient of a Vector Field
Brian D. Wood, Peeter Joot, Stephen Whitaker

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the Gibbsian representation of the gradient of a vector field, addressing ambiguities in common use and connecting it with geometric algebra to improve understanding in continuum mechanics.
Contribution
It reviews the history of the Gibbsian representation and offers suggestions to clarify its meaning in vector and tensor notation, including connections with geometric algebra.
Findings
Identifies ambiguity in common representations of the gradient of a vector field.
Provides historical context for the Gibbsian representation.
Connects Gibbsian representation with geometric algebra frameworks.
Abstract
In this note, we provide a important considerations of a familiar topic: the gradient of a vector field. The gradient of a vector field is a common quantity represented in continuum mechanics. However, even for Cartesian coordinate systems, there are two different representations for this quantity in common use, which leads to ambiguity in some results. We review the history leading to the \emph{Gibbsian representation} for the gradient of a vector field, and provide some suggestions to help clarify the meaning of such terms when represented in conventional Gibbsian vector or tensor notation. In an appendix, we briefly expand on the connection with the Gibbsian representation of the deformation and rotation tensors in the framework of geometric algebra (GA).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Elasticity and Material Modeling · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
