Effects of spatial resolution on inferences of atmospheric quantities from simulations
Thore E. Moe, Tiago M. D. Pereira, Mats Carlsson

TL;DR
This study investigates how the spatial resolution of 3D radiative MHD simulations affects the inference of atmospheric quantities from synthetic spectra, revealing that higher resolution captures finer details but also introduces systematic errors in inversions.
Contribution
It compares synthetic spectra from simulations at different resolutions and examines the impact on inferred atmospheric parameters and inversion accuracy, highlighting resolution-dependent effects.
Findings
Higher resolutions produce more detailed structures and extreme values.
Sub-resolution effects cause systematic errors in spectral inversions.
Diminishing returns observed with increasing sub-resolution effects.
Abstract
Small scale processes are thought to be important for the dynamics of the solar atmosphere. While numerical resolution fundamentally limits their inclusion in MHD simulations, real observations at the same nominal resolution should still contain imprints of sub-resolution effects. This means that the synthetic observables from a simulation of given resolution might not be directly comparable to real observables at the same resolution. It is thus of interest to investigate how inferences based on synthetic spectra from simulations with different numerical resolutions compare, and whether these differences persist after the spectra have been spatially degraded to a common resolution. We aim to compare synthetic spectra obtained from realistic 3D radiative magnetohydrodynamic (rMHD) simulations run at three different numerical resolutions from the same initial atmosphere, using very simple…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
