Euclid: Searching for pair-instability supernovae with the Deep Survey
T. J. Moriya (1, 2), C. Inserra (3), M. Tanaka (4, 5), E., Cappellaro (6), M. Della Valle (7, 8, 9), I. Hook (10), R. Kotak (11),, G. Longo (12, 8), F. Mannucci (13), S. Mattila (11), C. Tao (14), B., Altieri (15), A. Amara (16), N. Auricchio (17), D. Bonino (18), E. Branchini

TL;DR
The paper evaluates Euclid's Deep Survey capabilities to detect high-redshift pair-instability supernovae, predicting hundreds of discoveries and proposing methods for their identification based on duration and color.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Euclid's planned observations can potentially confirm pair-instability supernovae and estimates their expected detection numbers based on survey simulations.
Findings
Up to several hundred PISNe at z < 3.5 can be discovered.
PISNe can be identified by duration and color in Euclid data.
Euclid can lead to the first observational confirmation of PISNe.
Abstract
Pair-instability supernovae are theorized supernovae that have not yet been observationally confirmed. They are predicted to exist in low-metallicity environments. Because overall metallicity becomes lower at higher redshifts, deep near-infrared transient surveys probing high-redshift supernovae are suitable to discover pair-instability supernovae. The Euclid satellite, which is planned to be launched in 2023, has a near-infrared wide-field instrument that is suitable for a high-redshift supernova survey. The Euclid Deep Survey is planned to make regular observations of three Euclid Deep Fields (40 deg2 in total) spanning the Euclid's 6 year primary mission period. While the observations of the Euclid Deep Fields are not frequent, we show that the predicted long duration of pair-instability supernovae would allow us to search for high-redshift pair-instability supernovae with the Euclid…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
