Is the resonance $X_0(2900)$ a ground-state or radially excited scalar tetraquark $[ud][\overline{c}\overline{s}]$?
S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, H. Sundu

TL;DR
This paper uses QCD sum rules and light-cone sum rules to analyze whether the $X_0(2900)$ resonance can be a ground-state or excited tetraquark with a diquark-antidiquark structure, providing mass and width estimates that do not match the observed resonance.
Contribution
It offers a detailed theoretical investigation of the $X_0(2900)$ as a tetraquark, calculating its properties and showing it is unlikely to be the observed resonance, thus guiding future experimental searches.
Findings
Mass estimates do not match $X_0(2900)$
Full widths are inconsistent with the resonance
Provides predictions for ground and excited tetraquark states
Abstract
We investigate properties of the ground-state and first radially excited four-quark mesons and with a diquark-antidiquark structure and spin-parities . Our aim is to reveal whether or not one of these states can be identified with the resonance , recently discovered by the LHCb collaboration. We model and as tetraquarks composed of either axial-vector or scalar diquark and antidiquark pairs. Their spectroscopic parameters are computed by employing the QCD two-point sum rule method and including into analysis vacuum condensates up to dimension . For an axial-axial structure of , we find partial widths of the decays and , and estimate full widths of the states . To this end, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · High-Energy Particle Collisions Research · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
