Comment on "The statistics wars and intellectual conflicts of interest" by D. Mayo
Philip B. Stark

TL;DR
This paper discusses the misuse of P-values in scientific research, emphasizing their utility despite widespread abuse, and highlights issues like Type III errors where tests are disconnected from scientific hypotheses.
Contribution
It provides a nuanced perspective on P-value misuse, arguing against banning them and identifying common problems such as Type III errors in hypothesis testing.
Findings
Many reported P-values are not genuine P-values.
Type III errors are a significant problem in hypothesis testing.
Banning P-values is compared to banning scalpels due to misuse.
Abstract
While P-values are widely abused, they are a useful tool for many purposes; banning them is analogous to banning scalpels because most people do not know how to perform surgery. Many reported P-values are not genuine P-values, for a variety of reasons. Perhaps the most widespread and pernicious problem is the Type III error of testing a statistical hypothesis that has little or no connection to the scientific hypothesis.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth and Medical Research Impacts · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
