Comets in context: Comparing comet compositions with protosolar nebula models
Karen Willacy, Neal Turner, Boncho Bonev, Erika Gibb, Neil Dello, Russo, Michael DiSanti, Ronald J. Vervack Jr., Nathan X. Roth

TL;DR
This study compares observed comet compositions with protosolar nebula models to understand their formation conditions, revealing that comets likely formed from a mixture of processed materials under varying thermal histories.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of comet molecular abundances against nebula models, highlighting the necessity of mixed thermal processing to explain observed diversity.
Findings
Fiducial model explains individual molecule ranges but not all simultaneously.
A combination of warm and cold processed materials best fits comet compositions.
Jupiter-family and Oort cloud comets likely formed in overlapping disk regions.
Abstract
Comets provide a valuable window into the chemical and physical conditions at the time of their formation in the young solar system. We seek insights into where and when these objects formed by comparing the range of abundances observed for nine molecules and their average values across a sample of 29 comets to the predicted midplane ice abundances from models of the protosolar nebula. Our fiducial model, where ices are inherited from the interstellar medium, can account for the observed mixing ratio ranges of each molecule considered, but no single location or time reproduces the abundances of all molecules simultaneously. This suggests that each comet consists of material processed under a range of conditions. In contrast, a model where the initial composition of disk material is `reset', wiping out any previous chemical history, cannot account for the complete range of abundances…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
