Better-Than-$\frac{4}{3}$-Approximations for Leaf-to-Leaf Tree and Connectivity Augmentation
Federica Cecchetto, Vera Traub, Rico Zenklusen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a simple matching-based approach for leaf-to-leaf instances in the Connectivity Augmentation Problem, achieving approximation guarantees below 1.33 and improving previous bounds for TAP and CAP.
Contribution
It presents a new matching-based method for leaf-to-leaf instances, leading to better approximation ratios for TAP and CAP, including the first sub-1.33 guarantee for nontrivial instances.
Findings
Achieved a (4/3 + ε)-approximation for Leaf-to-Leaf CAP.
Improved the approximation factor for certain TAP/CAP instances to 1.29.
Extended guarantees beyond previously known cases for leaf-to-leaf instances.
Abstract
The Connectivity Augmentation Problem (CAP) together with a well-known special case thereof known as the Tree Augmentation Problem (TAP) are among the most basic Network Design problems. There has been a surge of interest recently to find approximation algorithms with guarantees below for both TAP and CAP, culminating in the currently best approximation factor for both problems of through quite sophisticated techniques. We present a new and arguably simple matching-based method for the well-known special case of leaf-to-leaf instances. Combining our work with prior techniques, we readily obtain a -approximation for Leaf-to-Leaf CAP by returning the better of our solution and one of an existing method. Prior to our work, a -guarantee was only known for Leaf-to-Leaf TAP instances on trees of height . Moreover, when combining our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
