Forecasting cosmological parameter constraints using multiple sparsity measurements as tracers of the mass profiles of dark matter haloes
P.S. Corasaniti, A.M.C. Le Brun, T.R.G. Richardson, Y. Rasera, S., Ettori, M. Arnaud, G.W Pratt

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that multiple sparsity measurements of dark matter haloes can significantly improve cosmological parameter constraints, revealing additional information beyond traditional NFW profile assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces the use of multiple sparsity measurements from different halo mass shells as a novel method to enhance cosmological inference, showing their low correlation and potential for improved constraints.
Findings
Multiple sparsities are weakly correlated, providing independent information.
Increasing sparsity measurements improves cosmological constraints up to four measurements.
Systematic mass bias errors have a mild impact on parameter inference.
Abstract
The dark matter halo sparsity, i.e. the ratio between spherical halo masses enclosing two different overdensities, provides a non-parametric proxy of the halo mass distribution which has been shown to be a sensitive probe of the cosmological imprint encoded in the mass profile of haloes hosting galaxy clusters. Mass estimations at several overdensities would allow for multiple sparsity measurements, that can potentially retrieve the entirety of the cosmological information imprinted on the halo profile. Here, we investigate the impact of multiple sparsity measurements on the cosmological model parameter inference. For this purpose, we analyse N-body halo catalogues from the Raygal and M2Csims simulations and evaluate the correlations among six different sparsities from Spherical Overdensity halo masses at and (in units of the critical density). Remarkably,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
