What Formulation Should One Choose for Modeling a 3D HTS Motor Pole with Ferromagnetic Materials?
Julien Dular, K\'evin Berger, Christophe Geuzaine, Beno\^it, Vanderheyden

TL;DR
This paper evaluates various finite-element formulations for modeling 3D HTS motors with ferromagnetic materials, proposing a coupled h-phi-a-formulation that improves robustness and efficiency in nonlinear system simulations.
Contribution
It introduces a coupled h-phi-a-formulation as an optimal modeling approach for 3D HTS motors with ferromagnetic materials, enhancing numerical robustness and reducing computational effort.
Findings
The h-phi-a-formulation is more robust than standard methods.
It significantly reduces the number of iterations needed.
The approach maintains low degrees of freedom.
Abstract
We discuss the relevance of several finite-element formulations for nonlinear systems containing high-temperature superconductors (HTS) and ferromagnetic materials (FM), in the context of a 3D motor pole model. The formulations are evaluated in terms of their numerical robustness and efficiency. We propose a coupled h-phi-a-formulation as an optimal choice, modeling the problem with an a-formulation in the FM and an h-phi-formulation in the remaining domains. While maintaining a low number of degrees of freedom, the h-phi-a-formulation guarantees a robust resolution and strongly reduces the number of iterations required for handling the nonlinearities of HTS and FM compared to standard formulations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
