Benchmarking CASPT3 Vertical Excitation Energies
Martial Boggio-Pasqua, Denis Jacquemin, Pierre-Fran\c{c}ois Loos

TL;DR
This study benchmarks the accuracy of CASPT3, a third-order multireference perturbation theory, in predicting vertical excitation energies across various excited states, comparing its performance to CASPT2 using a large reference dataset.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive assessment of CASPT3's accuracy for excited states, highlighting its similar performance to CASPT2 and insensitivity to the IPEA shift.
Findings
CASPT3 achieves a mean absolute error of 0.11 eV with IPEA shift.
CASPT3's accuracy is nearly unaffected by the IPEA shift.
CASPT3's error slightly reduces to 0.09 eV without IPEA shift.
Abstract
Based on 280 reference vertical transition energies of various natures (singlet, triplet, valence, Rydberg, , , and double excitations) extracted from the QUEST database, we assess the accuracy of third-order multireference perturbation theory, CASPT3, in the context of molecular excited states. When one applies the disputable ionization-potential-electron-affinity (IPEA) shift, we show that CASPT3 provides a similar accuracy as its second-order counterpart, CASPT2, with the same mean absolute error of eV. However, as already reported, we also observe that the accuracy of CASPT3 is almost insensitive to the IPEA shift, irrespective of the transition type and system size, with a small reduction of the mean absolute error to eV when the IPEA shift is switched off.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
