Understanding the compromise between skyline and ranking queries
Marco Tonnarelli

TL;DR
This paper surveys the concepts of skyline and ranking queries, highlighting their limitations and exploring the compromise solution of flexible skylines for multi-criteria decision support.
Contribution
It provides an overview of skyline and ranking queries, explaining their foundations and introducing the concept of flexible skylines as a compromise approach.
Findings
Skyline and ranking queries are essential for multi-criteria decision making.
Flexible skylines offer a compromise between the two techniques.
The survey clarifies the concepts and limitations of existing methods.
Abstract
Skyline and Ranking queries have gained great popularity in the recent years. These two techniques are crucial for multi-criteria decision support applications, which are now more popular than ever before. Skyline and Ranking queries are, however, affected by well-known limitations. In the past recent years, the database community provided numerous studies in this field with the aim to overcome the weaknesses of these two approaches. This survey introduces the reader to Skyline and Ranking queries, explaining the concepts on which they are based, with the intent to present the compromise between the two techniques: flexible skylines.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData Management and Algorithms · Geographic Information Systems Studies
