Chemical diversity of the atmospheres and interiors of sub-Neptunes: a case study of GJ 436 b
A. Guzm\'an-Mesa, D. Kitzmann, C. Mordasini, K. Heng

TL;DR
This study explores the chemical diversity of sub-Neptune atmospheres, using GJ 436 b as a case, highlighting the importance of self-consistent atmosphere-interior models and the limitations of current spectral fits.
Contribution
It introduces a combined atmosphere-interior modeling approach for sub-Neptunes and assesses the constraints from spectral data, emphasizing the need for self-consistent analysis with JWST.
Findings
High-metallicity models fit GJ 436 b's spectrum but are inconsistent with interior structures.
Current models cannot adequately fit the 4.5-micron Spitzer measurement, likely due to disequilibrium chemistry.
Emission and transmission spectra provide different constraints on atmospheric composition.
Abstract
The atmospheres of sub-Neptunes are expected to exhibit considerable chemical diversity, beyond what is anticipated for gas-giant exoplanets. In the current study, we construct self-consistent radiative transfer and equilibrium chemistry models to explore this chemical diversity. We use GJ 436 b as a case study to further study joint atmosphere-interior models. In particular, we constrain the properties of the interior and atmosphere of the planet based on the available Spitzer measurements. While it is possible to fit the emission spectrum of GJ 436 b using a high-metallicity model, we demonstrate that such an atmosphere is inconsistent with physically plausible interior structures. It remains the case that no existing study can adequately fit the 4.5-micron Spitzer secondary eclipse measurement, which is probably caused by chemical disequilibrium. Finally, an information content…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
