The structure of cluster merger shocks: turbulent width and the electron heating timescale
H. R. Russell (University of Nottingham), P. E. J. Nulsen, D., Caprioli, U. Chadayammuri, A. C. Fabian, M. W. Kunz, B. R. McNamara, J. S., Sanders, A. Richard-Laferri\`ere, M. Beleznay, R. E. A. Canning, J., Hlavacek-Larrondo, L. J. King

TL;DR
This study uses deep Chandra X-ray observations to measure the widths of merger shocks in galaxy cluster Abell 2146, revealing that electron heating is dominated by collisional processes rather than rapid collisionless mechanisms.
Contribution
First measurement of shock widths in a galaxy cluster merger, demonstrating consistency with collisionless shocks blurred by gas motions and providing insights into electron-ion thermal equilibration.
Findings
Shock widths are consistent with collisionless shocks affected by gas motions.
Electrons do not rapidly equilibrate with ions at the shock, favoring collisional processes.
Upstream shock shows complex structure with temperature increase ahead of the shock.
Abstract
We present a new 2 Ms Chandra observation of the cluster merger Abell 2146, which hosts two huge M~2 shock fronts each ~500 kpc across. For the first time, we resolve and measure the width of cluster merger shocks. The best-fit width for the bow shock is 17+/-1 kpc and for the upstream shock is 10.7+/-0.3 kpc. A narrow collisionless shock will appear broader in projection if its smooth shape is warped by local gas motions. We show that both shock widths are consistent with collisionless shocks blurred by local gas motions of 290+/-30 km/s. The upstream shock forms later on in the merger than the bow shock and is therefore expected to be significantly narrower. From the electron temperature profile behind the bow shock, we measure the timescale for the electrons and ions to come back into thermal equilibrium. We rule out rapid thermal equilibration of the electrons with the shock-heated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
