On Top-$k$ Selection from $m$-wise Partial Rankings via Borda Counting
Wenjing Chen, Ruida Zhou, Chao Tian, Cong Shen

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the effectiveness of Borda counting in identifying top-$k$ items from $m$-wise partial rankings, providing theoretical bounds and demonstrating its advantages over spectral MLE methods in non-parametric settings.
Contribution
The paper offers new theoretical performance bounds for Borda counting in $m$-wise ranking scenarios, extending previous pairwise comparison results and demonstrating its robustness in non-parametric models.
Findings
Borda counting accurately identifies top-$k$ items when score separation exceeds a threshold.
The bounds are tighter for pairwise comparisons ($m=2$) than previous results.
Numerical experiments show Borda counting outperforms spectral MLE in non-parametric data.
Abstract
We analyze the performance of the Borda counting algorithm in a non-parametric model. The algorithm needs to utilize probabilistic rankings of the items within -sized subsets to accurately determine which items are the overall top- items in a total of items. The Borda counting algorithm simply counts the cumulative scores for each item from these partial ranking observations. This generalizes a previous work of a similar nature by Shah et al. using probabilistic pairwise comparison data. The performance of the Borda counting algorithm critically depends on the associated score separation between the -th item and the -th item. Specifically, we show that if is greater than certain value, then the top- items selected by the algorithm is asymptotically accurate almost surely; if is below certain value, then the result will be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
