Revisiting and improving upper bounds for identifying codes
Florent Foucaud, Tuomo Lehtil\"a

TL;DR
This paper improves upper bounds for identifying codes in trees and bipartite graphs, introduces tight bounds for specific graph classes, and characterizes extremal structures, advancing understanding of code size limitations.
Contribution
It presents new upper bounds for identifying codes in trees and bipartite graphs, extending previous results and characterizing extremal graphs, some of which are tight bounds.
Findings
Upper bound of (n + ℓ)/2 for trees, tight for certain classes.
Upper bound of 2n/3 for twin-free bipartite graphs, with extremal examples characterized.
Generalized upper bound of (5n + 2ℓ)/7 for graphs with girth ≥ 5, tight for C7 and stars.
Abstract
An identifying code of a graph is a dominating set of such that any two distinct vertices of have distinct closed neighbourhoods within . These codes have been widely studied for over two decades. We give an improvement over all the best known upper bounds, some of which have stood for over 20 years, for identifying codes in trees, proving the upper bound of , where is the order and is the number of leaves (pendant vertices) of the graph. In addition to being an improvement in size, the new upper bound is also an improvement in generality, as it actually holds for bipartite graphs having no twins (pairs of vertices with the same closed or open neighbourhood) of degree 2 or greater. We also show that the bound is tight for an infinite class of graphs and that there are several structurally different families of trees attaining the bound. We then…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems
